BY NUMBER7 AIAP OPERATIONS · FINANCE BPO
Pransform Inc.
12 → 3reported AP staffing requirement
At 50K+ documents per month across 300+ client companies, extraction, validation and exception-led review changed where people worked.
Read Pransform’s case studyPROOF
Three customer operations. Three different automation problems.
AIdaptIQ publishes three separate customer cases: multi-client AP, purchase-order intake and freight reconciliation. Each result is shown with its workflow scope; the figures are not combined into one benchmark.
CUSTOMER CASE STUDIES
What changed in production.
Each result belongs to a separate workflow and measurement scope.
PURCHASE-ORDER INTAKE · CAPABILITY PROOF
JSK Automation
10×reported faster intake
Email PDFs, scans and WhatsApp-originated images entered one extraction, SKU-mapping and review path.
Read JSK Automation’s case studyFREIGHT RECONCILIATION · CAPABILITY PROOF
Fairlorry
2–3 daysmanual cycles → continuous checks
LR, invoice and operating context were connected so discrepancies could become owned follow-up earlier.
Read Fairlorry’s case studyMulti-client finance BPO delivery, exception-led review and scoped staffing economics.
Multichannel purchase-order intake and SKU mapping—not the near-term stateful three-way match.
Continuous evidence reconciliation in freight operations—not a universal enterprise AP benchmark.
Results are customer-reported and do not share one denominator. How to interpret these results →
CHOOSE THE EVIDENCE
Three ways to evaluate AIdaptIQ.
01Explore →02Explore →03Explore →
Production case
See the prior automation, remaining human work, AIdaptIQ intervention and qualified result.
Evaluation methodology
Freeze the transaction population, success definition and manual-rescue policy.
50-document diagnostic
Measure the automation boundary on representative difficult documents.
BUYING BOUNDARIES
Inspect the path to production.
Evaluate the workflow, not the headline.
Start with the production boundary or use your own documents.